|
If you are in the business of selling hormones then it’s in your interests to have an article endorsed by experts that supports your position. Such is the lead segment in the October 2009 edition of ‘Life Extension’ magazine found at www.lef.org. The article asks whether aging women should replace natural hormones and goes on to ponder why bio-identical hormone replacement therapy is still controversial despite all the benefits listed in the article, benefits which include protection against heart disease, prevention of osteoporosis, rejuvenation of the genital tract, enhancing the preservation of youthful looking skin and treating the symptoms of menopause without any of the downside risks of breast or uterine cancer.
Naturally the authors of this position have numerous research articles to back up their point of view not to mention a list of seven well-known luminaries listed at the end of the article indicating that a diverse group of experts have been happy to provide a peer-review stamp of approval.
Incredibly none of the research, and there is a lot of this if you look for it, clearly showing how natural hormones including oestrogen and progesterone are linked to an increased risk of breast cancer, gets a mention. There is scientific evidence that natural oestrogen can turn cells taken from fibrocystic breast tissue into cancer cells. Progesterone has also been connected as a causative force to breast cancer and once cancer cells are present can stimulate their growth.
Here I’m referring to natural hormones, the very hormones that this apology for intellectual honesty has the gumption to claim are safe. Neither the authors of the article nor the motley crew of respected peers who provided their nous and intellectual heft appear to have any awareness of this science. Or if they do know about it they certainly aren’t bringing it to our attention because it might put a crimp in their bottom line.
There is still a huge question mark around the notion that women need long-term hormone replacement therapy with natural hormones, in my view. Whether they can prevent heart disease and dementia, the two biggest threats to female longevity and wellbeing, if taken for an extended period, is still up for debate. Then there is the risk of cancer, which is not eliminated with natural hormone replacement, despite the protestations to the contrary in the above-mentioned article. This risk can be reduced by maintaining optimal weight, regular exercise, limiting consumption of alcohol, cutting down on the consumption of red meat and sweet foods, optimising the presence of vitamin D(1,25 vitamin D and not 25 OH vitamin D which can be measured by your physician) and with nutrients like iodine, selenium and resveratrol. The latest edition of my book ‘You have the power’ which is now found on Amazon has a section listing these in detail and explaining how they work.
IMPORTANT ANNOUNCEMENT:
I am pleased to announce that Memozeal for boosting memory and managing Tinitus is back in stock
|